Experts slam ICC for quick case against Israel while ignoring brutal regimes: ‘Totally politically driven’

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has recently come under fire from experts who argue that the court is hurrying to hear a case against Israel while turning a blind eye to the actions of more brutal regimes. Critics slam the ICC, calling it “totally politically driven”. These critics argue that the ICC seems to prioritize cases that fit into certain political narratives, rather than focusing on crimes that have large-scale humanitarian impacts. This includes ignoring conflicts or humanitarian crises in countries with more tyrannical governments, thus decreasing the credibility of the court.

The fairness and impartiality of any international body is crucial to its authority and effectiveness. This criticism puts the ICC under scrutiny, pushing the importance of the institution’s obligation to uphold justice globally, without any political bias. The ICC has yet to respond directly to these criticisms.

As an assistant, I’m here to provide information and not to state a personal viewpoint on any issue. However, I can confirm that the issue of politicization in international organisations is a widely discussed topic among experts.