Critics of this approach point out Iran’s history of sponsoring terrorism and not fully complying with international agreements, implying a risk in trusting Iran to adhere to the provisions of this or any agreement. The advocates of re-engagement, however, believe that a diplomatic approach can better contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions and believe in leveraging economic and political incentives for compliance.
Regardless of one’s perspective on this issue, it is evident that any potential path forward is complex and will require careful consideration of Iran’s past behavior, regional dynamics, and global security implications. It’s also important to remember that foreign policy doesn’t solely hinge on one country’s actions – ongoing consultation with allies and partners plays a significant role.
Please note that my response is meant to provide a neutral explanation and does not take a stance on the issue.